Obama Citizenship

Thomas v. Hosemann: Case Dismissed with Prejudice

By Phil

Please see the interesting history of this case here; the Order:

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

On December 2, 2008, Plaintiffs filed their ?Motion for Order to Show Cause Why the State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Office of Health Status Monitoring Is Not in Contempt of Court for Disobeying a Validly Issued and Served Subpoena Duces Tecum? (?Motion for OSC?). Plaintiffs issued this Subpoena Duces Tecum to the State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Office of Health Status Monitoring as part of discovery in an action filed in the Southern District of Mississippi, Thomas et al. v. Hosemann, Civil No. 08-00241 (the ?Underlying Action?). On December 17, 2008, the court in the Underlying Action dismissed the action with prejudice upon Plaintiffs? Motion. Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action and orders the Clerk of Court to close the case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 17, 2008.

/s/ J. ____ _M_i_c_h_a_e_l _S_e_a_b_ri_g_h_t__________

J. Michael Seabright

United States District Judge

To be dimissed “with prejudice,” according to Wikipedia:

This directly differs from a dismissal with prejudice, in which the claimant is barred from filing another case on the same claim. Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and the case becomes res judicata on the claims that were or could have been brought in it.

A current listing of eligibility lawsuits can be found here.

-Phil

Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on March 08, 2009 (boomark / email).