ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Obama Citizenship Blogs -> The Right Side of Life

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Obama Citizenship

: The Right Side of Life

The Sestak Scandal: Story Number 1 Begins Failing

By Phil

ADVERTISEMENTS
President Bill Clinton with Joe Sestak, and his wife, Susan, in 2006 when Mr. Sestak was running for the House of Representatives.

H. Rumph Jr./Associated Press: President Bill Clinton with Joe Sestak, and his wife, Susan, in 2006, when Mr. Sestak was running for the House of Representatives.

What’s the first sign that someone’s recollection isn’t the truth? The facts don’t line up.

You knew it had to happen.

Byron York over at the WashingtonExaminer found a very juicy tid-bit of this quickly-developing saga that was located — of all places — in The New York Times: Sestak was ineligible for job Clinton offered (excerpted):

In a little-noticed passage Friday, the New York Times reported that Rep. Joe Sestak was not eligible for a place on the President?s Intelligence Advisory Board, the job he was reportedly offered by former President Bill Clinton.  And indeed a look at the Board?s website reveals this restriction:

The Board consists of not more than 16 members appointed by the President from among individuals who are not employed by the Federal Government. Members are distinguished citizens selected from the national security, political, academic, and private sectors.

As a sitting member of Congress, Sestak was not eligible for the job.  And since the White House intended for Sestak to remain in his House seat, he would not have been eligible for the board after this November?s elections, provided he was re-elected to the House.

The statement from White House counsel Robert Bauer did not specifically mention the intelligence board, but speaking to reporters Friday, Sestak said of his conversation with Clinton, ?At the time, I heard the words ?presidential board,? and that?s all I heard?I heard ?presidential board,? and I think it was intel.? In addition, the Times reported that ?people briefed on the matter said one option was an appointment? to the intelligence board. But the White House could not legally have placed Sestak on the board.

The same story had been updated to report Rep. Issa’s (GOP) response.

Once again, HotAir makes the appropriate analysis/asks the right questions (emphases original):

If that was indeed the offer, then Sestak would have had to withdraw from his House race as well ? leaving him without any income.  How exactly would that have convinced Sestak to leave the race?  It sounds more like a threat than a warning. We?ll appoint you to this board unless you play ball!

This looks more like an ex post facto attempt to shoehorn the known facts into any kind of exonerating framework than the truth.  And the ambiguous statements surrounding this release also sound like an attempt to leave as much wiggle room as possible.  Oh, we didn?t mean the Intel Board, a rebuttal will almost certainly insist. We had a number of options in mind for Rep. Sestak.  The intel board was just a brainstorming suggestion.

But that would mean we would have to believe that the White House believed that Sestak would leave the race for some ambiguous promise of an unpaid position on a board without any specifics on what he?d be doing or the influence he would have on policy.  Maybe Sestak isn?t the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but why would anyone sentient enough to get himself elected to Congress in the first place even entertain such an offer as a serious proposal?  Nor is that what Sestak consistently alleged over the last few months; he said that the Obama administration had offered him a job, something specific.

Even better question:

Bill Clinton; Bill Clinton says Barack Obama must 'kiss my ass' for his support

Bill Clinton is still very bitter that Barack Obama beat his wife Hillary Photo: AP

If back in January of 2008 former President Bill Clinton said that Obama must “kiss my ass” for any support from the former President, why is Bubba helping Barry out now?

Promises, promises…

See the Impeachment category for general background on this story.

-Phil

Email: phil [at] therightsideoflife [dot] com

Subscribe via RSS feed and/or email updates


Full post as published by The Right Side of Life on May 29, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/01/26 00:50:47)