ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation Support

: Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence

VENDOR CODE OF COMPETITION: WHAT DO YOU THINK?

ADVERTISEMENTS

A reader asked me to post the following for comment. Please reply privately to my e-mail address and I will post your reply if desired. And because I know I will be asked, I do not permit comments because I don't want flamers or flame wars on this blog. But I am very good about posting serious comments!

Is it a rational idea to have a Vendor Code of Competition that would allow for EDD vendor CEOs to all agree to place comparative marketing information in the public domain - and agree not to threaten or sue other vendors if they market according to FTC rules and applicable advertising law?

 

There are firms today that threaten other competitive firms for any type of competitive marketing comparisons. Many times these threatening efforts stop smaller firms from competitively marketing, not because they are doing anything wrong - but because the smaller firms have neither the desire, time, or resources to contest the request of the threat. This anti-competitive behavior not only hurts  the smaller firms - but ultimately hurts the end users - clients who may or may not make different choices if they understood the comparitive facts and had a chance to address those facts with both vendors - so they (the end user) could make fully informed decisions. Moving these comparisons out of the office (where they do occur) into the public domain (online/print) would benefit all except those who are truly not transparent and honest about their firm's capabilities.

 

Any thoughts on how such an approach - such as public agreement to a vendor code - or any other approach/suggestions that would help achieve the same objective would be very much appreciated? Honest, straightforward, and legal comparisons should not be constrained by the lack of desire to contest threats of further legal action. Let good, legal presentation of info - a standard that we all should adhere to - be the rule and not the exception. And let the best tools for each EDD challenge be addresed by its own merit in relation to other offerings - regardless of the size of the legal budget of those firms involved in comparisons.

 

Thoughts?

 

E-mail: snelson@senseient.com       Phone: 703-359-0700

 

http://twitter.com/sharonnelsonesq

 

Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on March 11, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 13:17:13)