Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: Ride the Lightning: Electronic EvidenceDEJA VU: VENDOR CODE OF COMPETITION
I guess I'm exercising the eternal right of women to change their minds. Having declared this thread closed, I received a thoughtful response to my March 11th post that deserved the light of day. So, herewith:
Sharon,
This is a really late response to your post from 3/12/2009. Regardless, I still feel compelled to respond. First, I am stunned by the fact that firms threaten other firms for doing any type of competitive marketing comparison. Do you have any understanding of why these firms even consider this type of action? Are certain firms incorrectly portraying another?s firms capabilities? This type of behavior seems so counterintuitive to my I/T security cultural upbringing. I typically seek out this type of comparison whenever I am tasked to research, evaluate, recommend, purchase, and implement a solution for our business.
In principle, I agree that CEOs of EDD firms should agree on a vendor code of competition. I don?t think it should be mandatory (or even possible to make it mandatory). It appears that the RFP+Sub-Group of Sedona Conference has attempted to do something similar with their RFP Guidelines (http://www.thesedonaconference.org/ediscovery_html). I do see a potential marketing opportunity for EDD vendors that not only sign a vendor code of competition, but also release information in a standardized manner.
Bottom line, I think that consumers of EDD services will need to demonstrate their dislike for a lack of transparency and comparability of EDD capabilities by not selecting them. In addition, the consumer needs to complete a ?forensic analysis? of the marketing material from EDD firms. Specifically, I recommend consumers utilize the RFP and RFI processes to help obtain standardized \ comparable answers and help find out the true capabilities of the EDD vendor. The RFI process can build a short-list of preferred EDD firms, while the RFP process can be utilized to select the right firm for a given case.
I have used the following sources for creating RFIs and RFPs
· Sedona Conference (2005) Navigating the Vendor Proposal Process ? Best Practices for the Selection of Electronic Discover Vendors (http://www.thesedonaconference.org/dltForm?did=RFP_plus_july05ver.pdf)
· Merrill Corporation (2007/2008) How to Avoid the Five Critical Mistakes Made in the E-Discovery RFP Process
I enjoy your blog and hope that business is going well.
Robert Rost MA CISSP GFCA GSEC Security+
I/T Security Consultant
Information Security
Banner Health
************************
Thanks for writing Robert. OK, now this thread is officially closed. Unless I open it again.
Hope to see many of you next week at ABA TECHSHOW!
E-mail: snelson@senseient.com Phone: 703-359-0700
Full post as published by Ride the Lightning: Electronic Evidence on March 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Building Codes
National, local, and municipal building code sources
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Deja Vu
Exotic Dancers file class action claiming back wages
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Excessive Arrest
City of Worcester agrees to pay pizza vendor $100,000 settlement after breaking nine bones in his face.

The Vendor or VendorA Practical Consideration
China Manufacturing: Go With The Smell
Obama and Black Empowerment (Deja Vu)







