ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

Wisconsin Legislators Pursue Campaign Reform

By Lissette Villarruel

ADVERTISEMENTS

Three  legislators in Wisconsin, where Supreme Court elections have become more expensive and much nastier in recent years, are actively pushing campaign finance reform, an article in the Leader-Telegram reports.

In response to the disturbing rise of third-party influence on judicial elections, the Issue Ad Disclosure Bill would  make special interest advertising more transparent to the public, by requiring groups running campaign-season ads to reveal their contributors and the amount spent on their campaigns.

As one sponsor, State Representative Kristen Dexter, says in the article, the purpose of the bill is ??to protect the rights of voters to know who is trying to influence them and how much they are willing to spend to buy that influence.??

A second measure, the Impartial Justice Bill,   would publicly fund state Supreme Court campaigns in hopes of reducing  special interest campaign contributions.  A related Leader-Telegram editorial said that ?while [these two bills] may not drain the [political] swamp completely, hopefully they will make it a bit less treacherous.?

While some  Republicans are skeptical, the two parties seem to agree that disclosure from special interest groups should be required. In 2007, outside groups spent $4.8 million on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, compared with about $1.2 million by the official campaigns.

The other strategy, public financing for Supreme Court elections, is used in North Carolina and New Mexico.  In North Carolina, the percentage of special interest contributions to Supreme Court candidates fell dramatically, from 73% to 14%, when the system started in 2004. Thus, these two bills would seem to be a step in the right direction for Wisconsin.

For more information on Wisconsin campaign spending, you can read this Gavel Grab post.

Further suggestions of campaign reforms can be found in ?The New Politics of Judicial Elections: 2000? and ?The New Politics of Judicial Elections: 2002.? You can find more details concerning the North Carolina public finance system in this JAS press release.

Full post as published by The Gavel on January 27, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:59:42)