Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogSupreme Court Upholds Chancery Decision that Stock Cancellation Not Effective
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
In Reddy v. MKBS Company Limited, (Del. Supr., March 3, 2008), read opinion here, the Delaware Supreme Court (yesterday) affirmed a Chancery Court decision, summarized here, finding that an attempt to "cancel" shares, whether via the certificates representing those shares or the shares themselves, did not comply with statutory and related requirements. Both courts also addressed the difference between "void" and "voidable" stock. The money quote follows:
The cancellation of those shares could only be accomplished by complying with the procedure mandated by 8 Del. C. § 242—a written charter amendment, authorized by the board of directors, approved by the shareholders, and filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. Reddy concedes that those requirements are applicable to cancellations of stock, and that no charter amendment for either MKBS company was ever effected.
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on March 04, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
DirecTV
alleging a cancellation fee that is improperly or insufficiently disclosed to consumers.
DirecTV and Best Buy
allegedly failed to inform customers that they must return their receivers upon cancellation.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Supreme Court Upholds Preferred Stock Provision
Court of Chancery Upholds Proxy Power
Court of Chancery Upholds Director Decision Rejected by Stockholders
Court of Chancery Upholds Waiver of Dissolution and Receiver Rights in LLC
Court of Chancery Establishes Procedures for Contested Advancement Claims








