ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> CalBizLit

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: CalBizLit

Still More Chemicals Up For Proposition 65 Listing

By Bruce Nye

ADVERTISEMENTS

    Now we all got a good chuckle over the Proposition 65 Cancer Identification Committee's recent action in listing marijuana smoke as a carcinogen (see:  Proposition 65 Now Protects Stoners.  As they say, however, "but seriously folks . . . ."

    The CIC voted on May 29 to prioritize 38 more chemicals for possible listing as carcinogens.  Nine were designated as high priority, and these include fluoride (yep, theToothbrushtoothpaste stuff the dentists use, Crest puts in its toothpaste and many water districts add to the water), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (a once-common surfactant used in Teflon, Goretex, Scotch Guard) and -- "towards the bottom of the 'High' category depending on exposure considerations" Diisononyl phthalate (DINP).

    Now, if past is prologue, it may be a long, long, time before the CIC gets to a chemical that is "towards the bottom of the 'High' category."  But if it ever does, look out.  The Proposition 65 plaintiff bar has been going after the plasticizer DEHP with a vengeance for the past eighteen months.  While DEHP is listed both as a Proposition 65 carcinogen and a reproductive toxin, there is likely no duty to provide a cancer warning for DEHP because of the trial court's decision in Baxter v. Denton (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 333.  But until somebody proves that human exposures are below the MADL, there will be a duty to provide Proposition 65 warnings about that chemical's reproductive/developmental toxicity. 

    What does this have to do with DINP?  Well, for non-children's items, the substitute plasticizer of choice has been DINP (DINP is already banned on an interim basis pending further study by the recently enacted Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act).  If DINP makes it to the cancer list, the impact on manufacturers of inexpensive vinyl goods (think about just about any cheap soft plastic product you can imagine) is going to be huge.

    For more on Proposition 65 wackiness, you can always look at CalBizLit's collection of Proposition 65 posts here, or download my firm's White Paper on the subject here.

Full post as published by CalBizLit on June 30, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:19:41)