Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"I'm Sorry, I Can't Answer That"
ADVERTISEMENTS
"I'm Sorry, I Can't Answer That": Law Professor Lori A. Ringhand has posted this paper (abstract with links for download) online at SSRN. The paper's abstract begins, "Professors Robert Post and Reva Siegel have suggested that nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court should answer questions posed at their Senate confirmation hearings regarding how they would have voted in cases the Supreme Court has already decided." (Via "Legal Theory Blog.")Full post as published by How Appealing on January 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

You ask the search engine, I answer
So what is this collaborative law thing anyway
Advice for 1Ls: What If You Don't Know the Answer:
COA Holds Trial Court Erred In Striking Untimely Answer









