ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog

Chancery Court Addresses Distinctions Between Anti-Reliance v. Integration Clause

By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Airborne Health, Inc. v. Squid Soap, LP, C.A. No. 4410-VCL (November 23, 2009), read opinion here . A prior decision of the Court in this case was highlighted here. This Chancery Court decision addresses the distinction between an anti-reliance clause and an integration clause in a contract. There is much more to commend this important ruling and we hope to give it fuller treatment in the near term.

Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on November 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:33:48)