ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library

U.S. Supreme Court to Consider Vehicle Search Protocols of Police

By David Badertscher, PLL

ADVERTISEMENTS

Source: Crime and Justice News, February 26, 2008.

"A routine drug arrest in Tucson, Ariz., will be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify the circumstances in which police officers who do not have a warrant can search the vehicle of a person who is under arrest, reports the New York Times. The justices agreed on Monday to review the case of Rodney Joseph Gant, whose 1999 arrest raised questions that have divided Arizona courts. State officials are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a ruling last July by the state Supreme Court, which ruled that a search of Gant's car violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that the evidence must therefore be thrown out. Courts at all levels have wrestled over the years with the circumstances under which the police can search cars (and houses and people) without warrants."

"Two police officers went to a Tucson house in August 1999 after getting a tip about drug activity there. They had a brief conversation with Gant, then left. A record check revealed that Gant's was wanted on a warrant for driving with a suspended license. Officers returned to the house that evening, and Gant drove up and parked in his driveway. Gant was arrested a few moments after he got out of his car. He was handcuffed and locked in the back of a patrol car. A search of Gant's car turned up a plastic bag containing cocaine. After Gant was convicted of possession of a drug with intent to sell plus possession of drug paraphernalia, his lawyers appealed, asserting there had been no justification for the warrantless search of his vehicle. The Arizona high court agreed, holding that because Gant had been cuffed and the scene was secure, 'neither a concern for officer safety nor the preservation of evidence justified the warrantless search of Gant's car.' "

New York Times

Full post as published by New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library on February 26, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:03:53)