Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Oregon Legal Research

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Legal Research

: Oregon Legal Research

Oregon Supreme Court: Harassment Statute Declared Overbroad

ADVERTISEMENTS

Re: ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B)

OREGON v. JOHNSON (SC S055085)

Excerpt:

?GILLETTE, J.

This criminal case presents a question that lies at the intersection between Oregon's constitutional protection of free expression and an Oregon statute that punishes abusive or insulting speech that is calculated to produce a violent response. The Court of Appeals held that ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B), the abusive speech provision of the criminal harassment statute, does not, on its face, violate the free expression protections in Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution,(1) and that the statute also is not unconstitutional as applied to defendant's conduct in this case. State v. Johnson, 213 Or App 83, 159 P3d 1213 (2007). For the reasons explained below, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals?.
?
The consequence of applying the foregoing principles to the present case is clear. Defendant's expression may have been offensive, but the state may not suppress all speech that offends with the club of the criminal law. ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B) criminalizes a harm that results only from a kind of expression -- public insults through abusive words or gestures. The harm that the statute seeks to prevent -- harassment or annoyance -- generally is one against which the Oregon Constitution does not permit the criminal law to shield individuals when that harm is caused by another's speech. For that reason, we conclude that the prohibition contained in ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B) is overbroad on its face and violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution.(5) ? (link to full case)

Full post as published by Oregon Legal Research on August 15, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Searches

#1 Online Legal Resource

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

US Law Tweets

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

What is this?

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Temple U. Sexual Harassment Policy Struck Down As Overbroad

Statute of Limitations Upheld by Oregon Supreme Court

Oregon Supreme Court gives employers a break

Oregon Supreme Court ends cap on claims against public employees

Flawed jury instruction leads Oregon Supreme Court to affirm punitive damages

Oregon Supreme Court Requires Harm in Tobacco Suit