Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> FSU College of Law Library Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: FSU College of Law Library BlogMicrosoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp
By jlutz99
The US Supreme Court ruled on April 30 that Microsoft cannot be forced to pay for patent infringement which has occurred when copies of Windows are made or installed on computers abroad.
Excerpt:
It is the general rule under United States patent law that no infringement occurs when a patented product is made and sold in another country. There is an exception. Section 271(f) of the Patent Act,adopted in 1984, provides that infringement does occur when one ?suppl[ies] . . . from the United States,? for ?combination? abroad, apatented invention?s ?components.? 35 U. S. C. §271(f)(1). This case concerns the applicability of §271(f) to computer software first sentfrom the United States to a foreign manufacturer on a master disk,or by electronic transmission, then copied by the foreign recipient for installation on computers made and sold abroad.
Read the opinion here.
See an overview of the case here.
Posted by Jon Lutz
Full post as published by FSU College of Law Library Blog on April 30, 2007 (boomark / email).
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Rite Aid Corp. and Eckerd Corp.
allegedly failed to pay overtime to assistant store managers.
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Waters Corp
WAT

Microsoft v. AT&T Argued in the High Court
IFI Releases Top Patent Filers For 2007
Microsoft skates in third Lucent case
Yahoo-Microsoft or Yahoo-News Corp
Yahoo Looks For Alternatives to Microsoft









