ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

The Toyota Plot Thickens

By Nathan Koppel

ADVERTISEMENTS

Toyota imageWe return to the Toyota acceleration madness in light of some big news today ─ none of it good for the auto maker.

First, Toyota confirmed today that it has received subpoenas from a U.S. federal grand jury and the Securities and Exchange Commission, both requesting documents related to sudden unintended acceleration and the braking system of its Prius hybrid. Toyota said it intends to cooperate with the investigations and is preparing its responses to the requests.

Also, Congressmen Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak, who chair committees charged with looking into sudden acceleration issues, sent a pointed letter today to Jim Lentz, Toyota's head of U.S. sales, raising questions about whether the company has addressed acceleration issues in good faith. Here's a WSJ article on the latest developments.

The legislators in the letter say that their review of internal Toyota documents raises "significant concerns," including that Toyota "consistently dismissed the possibility that electronic failures could be responsible for incidents of sudden acceleration."

Toyota, they write, has produced just one report purporting to test and analyze potential electronic causes of sudden acceleration, but the report "appears to have serious flaws," including using "extremely small sample sizes."

Third, they claim, Toyota has issued misleading comments about the adequacy of its recent recalls.

A separate letter today from Waxman and Stupak to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood raises concerns that federal safety regulators “lack the expertise needed to evaluate defects in vehicle electronic controls.”

Click here for the letter to Lentz and here for the letter to LaHood.

The letters set the stage for a potentially dramatic showdown tomorrow in Congress when Lentz and LaHood are set testify.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on February 22, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0025 secs (from cache 10/31/26 10:23:15)