ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Pondering Bonuses: What Will Santa Bring Associates this Year?

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

bowtieHeading into the end of the year, law firm managing partners have an interesting decision to make vis-a-vis associate bonuses. Do they try to match the bonuses given by the leaders — typically such big-name firms as Cravath or Sullivan & Cromwell — and risk angering their clients, many of whom are asking for discounts in these difficult times? Or, with clients in mind, do they reject the traditional bonus game and risk alienating their associates?

It’s a dilemma nicely framed this morning by Tony Lin at the New York Law Journal.

According to Lin, year-end bonuses were not commonly a part of associate compensation until the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, when many young lawyers, especially on the coasts, were swapping law-firm gigs for the mad money and stock options of startups. So firms had to ante up to keep bodies in the building. Lin explains that when the dot-com boom ended in 2001, there was an expectation by some firms that the “boom-year” bonus would also die. But it didn’t, and ever since, the end-of-the-year bonus has been an expected part of associate compensation.

So what happens now, as the financial meltdown has left many firms struggling to tread water? Some seem to think that firms will continue to pretend it’s 2006. “This economy is bad, no question, but it’s not catastrophic for us,” one BigLaw managing partner told the NYLJ. “It’s not a basis to cut associates’ pay, which is what getting rid of the bonus would amount to.”

But Orrick’s Ralph Baxter isn’t so sure. Baxter, whose firm laid off 40 lawyers last week, called the current system “not sustainable.”

“The market was set up assuming that every associate coming out of law school wanted to work 3,000 hours a year so he could make partner and work 3,000 hours a year for the next 20 years,” said Baxter. “Clearly, that’s not reality.”

LBers, anyone out there heard anything?

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on November 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0036 secs (from cache 10/31/26 22:56:24)