Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> It's (Barely) Legal
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: It's (Barely) LegalPalimony for a mistress?
By Glen Ashman
ADVERTISEMENTS
N.J. High Court Hears Pitch for Palimony Sans CohabitationNew Jersey Law Journal
For the nearly three decades that New Jersey has recognized a cause of action for palimony, cohabitation has been the litmus test. No degree of love, devotion, mutual assurance or sacrifice has been found sufficient without it. But what if the couple is intimate for two decades but can't cohabit because one party stays married to someone else? Put more bluntly, is there equitable power to award palimony to a mistress? The lower courts have said no, putting the issue before the state Supreme Court.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1200996339591
Full post as published by It's (Barely) Legal on January 23, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

NJ Supreme Court: Cohabitation not needed to get palimony
Case Law Development: Damages in Palimony Actions
"Virtual Worlds, Social Networking, Web 2.0: The Jealous Mistress Is Online"
Rich Trial Lawyer Moved Senator Edwards Mistress
It's all a matter of perspective.









