ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Are Consumer Class-Actions Bans Going the Way of the Dodo?

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

While consumers, according to reports, continue to get hammered in arbitration, they’re making some significant headway on the class-action front. In today’s WSJ, Nathan Koppel writes that efforts by companies to prevent consumers from pursuing class-actions are increasingly get tossed by state courts.

dodo_art_200v_20080703094128.jpg

The dodo (Raphus cucullatus) was a flightless bird endemic to the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius. The dodo has been extinct since the mid-to-late 17th century. (Credit: Squidoo)

Over the past 10 years, companies in industries such as credit cards, technology, automotive and telecom have increasingly required customers to agree to pursue claims through arbitration and to waive their right to join class actions. But state supreme courts in New Mexico, Illinois, New Jersey, North Carolina and Washington have struck down such bans. Lawyers say these and similar rulings apply only to smaller-dollar claims in which consumers would, in effect, have no means of redress if they could not join class actions.

Last week, the New Mexico Supreme Court held that a consumer agreement prohibiting class-action suits violates that state’s public policy and is “unconscionable.” The case concerned Dell’s requirement that its customers pursue claims through arbitration, and on an individual basis only.

Companies argues that plaintiffs’ lawyers, in search of big paydays, routinely file spurious class actions that yield at most negligible awards for their clients — even though defendants often settle because of the risk of a huge verdict. Alan Kaplinsky, a Philly lawyer who assists companies in drafting arbitration clauses, says that in many state courts, “unfortunately, there is an orientation towards doing things to protect the plaintiffs’ trial bar, including ruling that consumers, in effect, have an unwaivable right to bring a class action.”

LB’ers, please weigh in: Is this a good trend in the law, or not?

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on July 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 10/31/26 15:39:22)