Legal Malpractice

Federal Question Jurisdiction Exists Over Legal Malpractice Claims
Source:Lexology, February 25, 2008. Federal question jurisdiction exists over legal malpractice claims where infringement is a necessary element of the malpractice claimFish & Richardson PC"Fed Cir affirms denial of Akin Gump's motion to remand to state court the legal malpractice suit brought against the law firm...

Federal question jurisdiction does not exist to enable removal from state court to federal court of a lawsuit alleging attorney malpractice during an earlier a federal trademark lawsuit
Federal question jurisdiction does not exist to enable removal from state court to federal court of a lawsuit alleging attorney malpractice during an earlier a federal trademark lawsuit: A unanimous three-judge panel of the U...

Law Review 2008: Ideas for Student Notes.
Impact of prior Arbitration Clauses (and other ADR agreements) for Section 337 (patent) investigations within the International Trade Commission (ITC). Federal Jurisdiction over Patent Malpractice Lawsuits (http://www...

ND Cal - Plaintiff's claims did not arise under patent la
Altavion, Inc. v. Konica-Minolta Systems Lab., Inc. (5/7/08) The court granted Altavion's motion to remand, ultimately concluding that the claims at issue did not arise under federal patent law...

Why do courts keep getting this stuff wrong
Before my current video evidence fascination, the focus of my procedure scholarship had been the distinction between subject matter jurisdiction and substantive merits in federal question cases...

Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Federal Arbitration Act
Click here to read "Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Federal Arbitration Act," posted on SSRN by Northern Kentucky Profs. Richard Bales and Jamie Ireland. The article is forthcoming in the Colorado Law Review, and the abstract follows....