Legal Commentary

What price for taking on this risk?

By Tom Kirkendall

I've never really understood the basis of the widespread criticism that professional football players are paid too much. In light of the pubic disclosure of the findings of a National Football League-sponsored study regarding the high rate of dementia in former NFL players, it occurs to me that the players aren't paid enough for the risks that they take.

Moreover, what happened to star Florida QB Tim Tebow last weekend underscores that the professional players in big-time college football are even more grossly underpaid than NFL players. Although an entertaining form of corruption, the NCAA's regulation of compensation to the athletes who largely create the wealth for university college football programs is nonetheless stunningly brazen corruption. That the mainstream media and much of the public stand by and continue to allow this parasitic system to flourish does not reflect well on us.

There is nothing wrong with universities being involved in promoting minor league professional football. If university leaders conclude that that such an investment is good for the promotion of the school and the academic environment, then so be it. But let's be honest about it. Allow the players who create wealth for the university to be paid directly, let's allow the universities to establish farm team agreements with NFL teams, and let's cut out the hypocritical incentives that are built into the current system.

Not only will it be fairer for the players who take substantial risk of injury, it would obviate the compromising of academic integrity that universities commonly endure under the current system.

Shouldn't that be enough incentive to reform the current system?

Full post as published by Houston's Clear Thinkers on October 01, 2009 (boomark / email).