Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: ConglomerateRisk Taking v. Risk Management
By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring
ADVERTISEMENTS
In an earlier post, I discussed risk-taking decisions by boards and whether excessive risk-taking might constitute a breach of a board?s fiduciary duties, particularly in the insolvency context. A board?s potential liability for risky investment decisions begs the question, ?What can boards do to better protect themselves and corporate value?? I think the growing importance of enterprise risk management could help answer this question.
The truly malfeasant bo read more
Full post as published by Conglomerate on November 13, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Standard & Poors somehow to incorporate legal risk assessments into its ratings
Risk Management Lost: Part II.
Bonus Babies Ignore Risk Management.
Call for Papers: Psychology and Risk Management
Director's and Officer's Risk Management Included in Financial Fiduciary Duties.
An example of crossing the line from lawyer to business executive
It's time to embrace Risk Management








