ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> TalkLeft

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: TalkLeft

Senate Rejects Thune Amendment on Concealed Weapons

By Jeralyn

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Senate today rejected Sen. John Thune's amendment to the defense spending bill that would allow people with concealed weapons permits in one state to bring them into another state that allows concealed weapons permits. 48 states (all but Illinois and Wisconsin) provide concealed weapons permits.

The measure failed by 2 votes, 58 to 39. (60 votes were needed.) Score one for the gun control lobby. I think the objections to the bill are specious -- and in the case of NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg, verge on hysteria.

"This is about as anti-police, pro-gun trafficker piece of legislation that has ever come before the United States Senate," said New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg Tuesday.

[More...]

What the law would have provided:

The gun proposal would have made concealed weapons permits from one state valid in other states as long as the person obeys the laws of other states, such as weapons bans in certain localities. It would not have established national standards for concealed weapons permits and would not allow those with permits to carry weapons into Wisconsin and Illinois.

Backers, led by Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said truckers and others with concealed weapons permits should be able to protect themselves when they cross into other states. Opponents countered that the measure would force states with strict procedures for getting permits to accept permits from states with more lax laws.

As a strong supporter of the individual right to bear arms and the Second Amendment, I'm sorry the amendment was defeated, but I don't think it should have been tagged on to the defense spending bill to begin with. Neither should the hate crimes law have passed this way. Why can't we just have amendments that deal with the topic? And if we're not going to do it that way, why doesn't someone introduce an amendment to the defense spending bill equalizing crack and powder cocaine penalties, which just could pass, since Obama and the DOJ support it?


Full post as published by TalkLeft on July 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 07:19:28)