Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditSecond Circuit Strikes Down FCC Indecency Policy as Unconstitutional : Fleeting Expletives are Protected Speech
By Andis Kaulins
"LEVAL, POOLER, and HALL, Circuit Judges....We agree with the Court's decision as being right on the Constitutional Law issue but we do hope that the case does not help to contribute to the general decline in the quality of speech on public and private media, where expletives too often seem to replace thought and intelligent language expressiveness and where the intellectual level of language used is sometimes what we would simply call language garbage. Unfortunately, such language garbage is also speech protected by the 1st Amendment.
POOLER, Circuit Judge:
This petition for review comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Previously
we held, with Judge Leval dissenting, that the indecency policy of the Federal Communications
Commission (?FCC? or ?Commission?) was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative
Procedure Act (?APA?), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). See Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 489
F.3d 444, 462 (2d Cir. 2007). The Supreme Court reversed, upholding the policy under the APA
and remanding for consideration of petitioners? constitutional arguments. See Fox Television
Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 129 S. Ct. 1800, 1819 (2009) (Scalia, J.). We now hold that the FCC?s
policy violates the First Amendment because it is unconstitutionally vague, creating a chilling
effect that goes far beyond the fleeting expletives at issue here. Thus, we grant the petition for review and vacate the FCC?s order and the indecency policy underlying it."
Full post as published by LawPundit on July 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
New York, NY and the NYPD
alleging false arrest for violating an unconstitutional anti-loitering law.
State Farm Class Actions
Policy Holders Settle
Wal-Mart
Faces Class Action over Return Policy
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Second Circuit Strikes Down "Fleeting Expletives" Policy On Constitutional Grounds
Second Circuit Throws Out FCC Indecency Policy for Vagueness
FCC facing defeat in fleeting expletives case
"NYC court tosses US fleeting expletives policy"
Shit ... the US Supreme Court considers fleeting expletives









