Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsSCOTUS Digs Philip Morris
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
Thanks to Adam Richardson, one of my RA's and fave students, I just got word that the Supreme Court dismissed cert on the Philip Morris punitive damages case as improvidently granted. It was a one line per curiam statement, available here. Lyle Denniston of the indispensable SCOTUSBlog has this brief report. I'd be curious to hear rank speculation about why the case got DIG'd in the comments. In the meantime, here's a snippet of Lyle's work, and some links to my own recent and forthcoming work in the area of punitive damages.
Mrs. Williams? lawyers told the Court this time: ?Twelve years after the tragic death that gave rise to this action and nine years after the lengthy trial of this case, with four appellate reviews in Oregon, and five years after the first of three trips to this Court, it is time for this litigation marathon to end.? The marathon, however, may not be over yet. Philip Morris, at an earlier stage in the case, reserved the right to challenge a state law that requires that 60 percent of a punitive verdict goes to the state of Oregon. The company?s argument against that is that Oregon has achieved all of the proceeds it is entitled to have under the global settlement of a group of states? lawsuit against the industry. Mrs. Williams? lawyers, backed by the Oregon attorney general, have argued that the tobacco settlement only applied to that specific case, and thus would have no effect on the verdict in her case. Philip Morris must take an affirmative new step to revive this issue, according to lawyers involved. The verdict stood at nearly $143 million a year ago when Philip Morris filed its latest petition in the Supreme Court. Under Oregon law, the interest rises at 9 percent a year, indicating that the award is now worth something around $156 million. Mrs. Williams? 40 percent share would thus appear to be somewhere above $60 million. (The compensatory award of $521,485.50 has not yet been paid, because Philip Morris? various appeals sought a new trial on the entire verdict.)
Full post as published by Prawfs on March 31, 2009 (boomark / email).
Is Obama a Natural Born Citien?
Philip J. Berg, Esquire vs. Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham, et al
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Philip Morris
Jury Decides Against Big Tobacco
Altria's Phillip Morris
to Pay $8 Million to Smoker's Widow

Breaking News: Scotus Denies Philip Morriss Appeal of Widows Award
Colby on Philip Morris v. Williams
Cornell's LII Bulletin Previews SCOTUS Argument in Philip Morris v. Williams
"Philip Morris sues S.F. over tobacco sales ban"
No Cert Decision Yet In Philip Morris v. Williams II








