Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyDoJ vs. Civil Rights Commission
By Jonathan H. Adler
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights wants to investigate the Department of Justice?s handling of voter intimidation charges against members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia. According to this report, the Justice Department is instructing its attorneys not to cooperate.
The commission last week subpoenaed at least two Justice Department lawyers and sought documents from the department to explain why the complaint was dismissed just as a federal judge was about to punish the New Black Panther Party and three of its members for intimidating voters.
Joseph H. Hunt, director of the Justice Department?s Federal Programs Branch, ordered the lawyers? silence in a letter to the attorney for J. Christian Adams, the lead attorney for the department in the New Black Panther case. The letter said ?well-established? and ?lawful? Justice Department guidelines prohibited Mr. Adams? cooperation in the commission probe.
In the letter, Mr. Hunt said the Civil Rights Commission ?possesses no authority to initiate criminal prosecution of anyone? and has the ability only to make referrals to the Justice Department recommending that a criminal case be opened. The commission does not have the authority to enforce subpoenas, he added.
(LvIP)
It looks to me like an interesting turf battle is in the works. (Of course, I doubt it will compare with the Commission?s prior turf battles.)
Copyright © 2009
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on December 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Gay Marriage Laws
Where same sex couples can marry
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.
Video Taping Arrest
Harris County pays wrongfully arrested brothers $1.7 million civil rights settlement.

Ohio Civil Rights Commission Creates Hall of Fame
Civil Rights Commission to Study RLUIPA
Civil Rights Commission to review DOJ plans for 2008 presidential election
Gay Activists Want Pro-Family FPC Rep Ousted from Civil Rights Commission







