Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyChristmas for Drug Companies, Coal for OTC Consumers
By Jonathan H. Adler
Both the House and Senate health care bills contain an unwelcome surprise for those whose current health care plans allow ?flexible savings accounts? for out-of-pocket medical expenditures. FSAs enable people to spend pre-tax dollars on medical expenditures, including doctor visit co-pays and drug costs. Money is deducted from an employee?s paycheck, pre-tax, and placed in a separate account that can only be used to reimburse for medical expenses incurred over the course of a year.
In 2003, the federal government concluded that FSA dollars could be used for over-the-counter medicines. This was a boon for consumers, and helped reduce health care costs by making it less expensive for many consumers to substitute less expensive OTC remedies for prescription drugs. In my own case, it was much cheaper for me to use a prescription allergy medicine than an equally effective OTC drug because my drug co-pay was lower than the cost of the OTC product. Allowing FSA reimbursement for OTC drugs helped close the gap. It was also a major benefit for families, as expenditures on things like Pedialyte and pre-natal vitamins were also eligible.
This is all going to change if the current health care bills become law, however. As John Berlau reports, both the House and Senate bills would restrict the use of FSAs (and Health Savings Accounts) to prescription drugs and insulin. This will be a boon to drug makers insofar as prescription drugs are more profitable than OTC medicines, but could increase medical costs for many Americans ? and is also likely to increase health care costs overall.
This sort of thing is nothing new. In 2005, Pfizer began supporting greater regulation of pseudophedrineto force it behind the pharmacist?s counter, just as it prepared to market products containing a less-effective alternativephenylephrine (PE) ahead of its competitors. The profit motive may induce drug companies to develop life-saving (and profit-making) medicines ? and that?s a wonderful thing ? but it is also encourages efforts to game the regulatory system. In this case, a small shift in the rules for FSAs allows drug makers to gain at consumer expense. Alas, I doubt it?s the only corporate goodie stuffed inside the health care overhaul.
Copyright © 2009
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on December 26, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.
DirecTV
alleging a cancellation fee that is improperly or insufficiently disclosed to consumers.
Antitrust
Price Fixing Could Cost Consumers up to $300 Billion Annually
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
FDA Issues Warning Regarding Topical Ibuprofen Drug Products
Topical Ibuprofen Drug Products FDA Issues Warning Letters

Tool against Drug Ads: CR AdWatch
Dangerous Drugs--Who Is The FDA Trying To Protect
End of Year Brings Lumps of Coal for Law Firms
Envirtonment - More on coal ash; costs of coal-gasification
FTC says 'pay-for-delay' contracts between drug makers hurt consumers








