Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Althouse
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: AlthouseBob Wright proposes a "competition to see who can be more civil and at the same time be more disagreeing in a substantively contentious way."
How could this competition could take place? Which post(s) of mine would be the venue? And who could ever judge whether a group of persons over a series of statements is "more civil and at the same time ... more disagreeing in a substantively contentious way"? How do you even know who counts as the real Althouse commenters and the real Bloggingheads commenters? Some of my commenters are people who would want my side to lose, and they will have an incentive to say really uncivil and unsubstantive things. And some of my best commenters are people who don't engage substantively but do idiosyncratic off-subject things.
But if any Bloggingheads commenters want to drop in over here, on one of the posts that sets up a substantive topic, and try to interact within this community, they can see what it's like here and how it compares to the Bloggingheads comments section. They can write down theirobservations about the experience on this post.
By the same token, I invite my commenters to go to some recent Bloggingheads diavlogs ? you don't need to identify yourself as an Althouse commenter when you do that ? and experience life as a commenter in that environment. Then come back to this post and talk about it.
So let this be the post where we talk about ? and judge! ? the competition Bob proposes. But please, don't change the way you comment to try to win (or lose) the competition. If Bob thinks some of what we do is too unsubstantive to be good as he defines good, that's his problem. We should not be shaken away from our right to define our own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of blogging comments.
(Here's the earlier post of mine that Bob refers to at the beginning of the clip.)
Full post as published by Althouse on July 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Gay Marriage Laws
Where same sex couples can marry
Shell Canada Proposes Heavy Oil Refinery
Air and Water at Risk in Michigan
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Verizon Wireless
Proposes a $21 Million Early Termination Settlement
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Faulty Homes
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. pays HUD $75,000 civil penalty for defective construction.
Health Plan Boycott
Connecticut chiropractic groups to pay $87,000 fine in civil suit.

Obama on Wright: He Really Means It This Time.--
International Network of Civil Society Organisations on Competition Formed
ACCC proposes revocation of eBay section 47 exclusive dealing immunity
Axing Dr. Wright: Sorry, We Think You'll Be a Downer
Mr. Wright Wrong For NU: Northwestern Disinvites Rev. Jeremiah Wright to Graduation
Senior Associate Intellectual Property - Blake Dawson - Non Contentious








