ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Technology Blogs -> Social Media Law Student

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Technology

: Social Media Law Student

Florida: Judges Cannot be Facebook Friends with Litigants

By Josh Camson

ADVERTISEMENTS

florida-sealFlorida’s Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee responded to a few questions from one Florida judge about the use of social networking sites. The Committee found that judges cannot accept friend requests from litigants in their court. They take special care to note:

This opinion should not be interpreted to mean that the inquiring judge is prohibited from identifying any person as a “friend” on a social networking site. Instead, it is limited to the facts presented by the inquiring judge, related to lawyers who may appear before the judge. Therefore, this opinion does not apply to the practice of listing as ?friends? persons other than lawyers, or to listing as ?friends? lawyers who do not appear before the judge, either because they do not practice in the judge’s area or court or because the judge has listed them on the judge?s recusal list so that their cases are not assigned to the judge.

It’s pretty clear from this opinion that accepting a request on Facebook, LinkedIn and Myspace from a litigant in the judge’s court are out. The opinion does not just apply to those sites though:

Although Facebook has been used as an example in this opinion, the holding of the opinion would apply to any social networking site which requires the member of the site to approve the listing of a ?friend? or contact on the member’s site, if (1) that person is a lawyer who appears before the judge, and (2) identification of the lawyer as the judge?s ?friend? is thereafter displayed to the public or the judge’s or lawyer’s other ?friends? on the judge’s or the lawyer’s page.

Any sites with a Facebook-like approach will obviously meet the criteria of this opinion. My question is: what about Twitter? If someone is protected on Twitter, they have to approve all followers. However, anybody can see which followers have been approved. So, does that constitute identification as a “friend” on the judge’s page? I think it very well might.

You can read the full committee opinion, which also discusses campaign committees, here.

Hat tip to the Legal Profession Blog for finding this.

This post originally published on JoshCamson.com.

Related posts:

  1. School Sues Student for Facebook Comments
  2. Facebook Cuts Junk Launches Facebook Lite
  3. A Lawyer Can Have a Facebook Page


Full post as published by Social Media Law Student on December 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 10/31/26 02:15:32)