Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Technology Blogs -> Social Media Law Student
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Technology
: Social Media Law StudentFlorida: Judges Cannot be Facebook Friends with Litigants
By Josh Camson
Florida’s Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee responded to a few questions from one Florida judge about the use of social networking sites. The Committee found that judges cannot accept friend requests from litigants in their court. They take special care to note:
This opinion should not be interpreted to mean that the inquiring judge is prohibited from identifying any person as a “friend” on a social networking site. Instead, it is limited to the facts presented by the inquiring judge, related to lawyers who may appear before the judge. Therefore, this opinion does not apply to the practice of listing as ?friends? persons other than lawyers, or to listing as ?friends? lawyers who do not appear before the judge, either because they do not practice in the judge’s area or court or because the judge has listed them on the judge?s recusal list so that their cases are not assigned to the judge.
It’s pretty clear from this opinion that accepting a request on Facebook, LinkedIn and Myspace from a litigant in the judge’s court are out. The opinion does not just apply to those sites though:
Although Facebook has been used as an example in this opinion, the holding of the opinion would apply to any social networking site which requires the member of the site to approve the listing of a ?friend? or contact on the member’s site, if (1) that person is a lawyer who appears before the judge, and (2) identification of the lawyer as the judge?s ?friend? is thereafter displayed to the public or the judge’s or lawyer’s other ?friends? on the judge’s or the lawyer’s page.
Any sites with a Facebook-like approach will obviously meet the criteria of this opinion. My question is: what about Twitter? If someone is protected on Twitter, they have to approve all followers. However, anybody can see which followers have been approved. So, does that constitute identification as a “friend” on the judge’s page? I think it very well might.
You can read the full committee opinion, which also discusses campaign committees, here.
Hat tip to the Legal Profession Blog for finding this.
This post originally published on JoshCamson.com.
Related posts:
- School Sues Student for Facebook Comments
- Facebook Cuts Junk Launches Facebook Lite
- A Lawyer Can Have a Facebook Page
Full post as published by Social Media Law Student on December 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Women and the Law
Women in the Justice System (judges, attorneys)
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Facebook / Blockbuster
alleging that Facebook distributed your Blockbuster movie rental information without your knowledge or consent.
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
Toy Recall
RC2 Corporation agrees to $30 million Thomas and Friends lead paint contamination class action settlement.
Facebook
Downloading Games Linked to Possible Identity Theft
Facebook
Wins $873 Million Settlement

Lawyers Beware: Judges May Be Watching You on Social Media
Facebook and Imaginary "Friends"
Mental Health and Civil Litigation








