Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Students Blogs -> The Once and Future Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Students
: The Once and Future LawyerDC Gun ban/second amendment case out shortly
I'm currently of the mindset that strict construction would not make sense given the fact that everybody had guns back then, and the literal reading of the text "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" may suggest that the clause "right of the people to keep and bear Arms" applies only to the Militia, which in turn is controlled by the State. Since that is certainly an unpopular meaning that would effectively vitiate the individual right, it will be interesting to see how what I am sure should be a 9-0 decision with various concurrences (rather than a 5-4 disaster) works it out.
Full post as published by The Once and Future Lawyer on June 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

Audiotape of gun case out early
Bush Lied - They Died T-Shirt Case Concludes - First Amendment Wins
After 220 years, should the Second Amendment stay minimalist
What does D.C. v. Heller mean for *First* Amendment Rights








