ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

TRO Denied; Obama Can Still Run -- For Now

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Obama campaign is probably breathing a big sigh of relief now that the motion for temporary restraining order sought by Philip J. Berg, Esquire, has been denied.  Berg, who says he is a Democrat (and presumably a Clinton supporter), filed a lawsuit last Thursday in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Obama, the DNC and the FEC, claiming that Obama cannot be president because he is not a "natural born Citizen," as required by Article II, Section I of the Constitution.  Berg also immediately sought a TRO to "put a stop to Defendant Obama's fraudulent campaign scheme."

Plaintiff Berg is a Pennsylvania attorney who is acting pro se in the matter.  While the skepticism that usually attaches to pro se plaintiffs may not be justified, generally speaking -- except that it is -- Berg did not help his credibility by referring to himself under "Parties" as "Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter "Plaintiff"] . . . ."

First, it is usually possible to figure out who the plaintiff is in a lawsuit without that kind of bracketed help, especially when he has called himself that twice already in the same sentence.  Second, Plaintiff Plaintiff Berg, you're suing a presidential candidate on the eve of the nominating convention and you couldn't take a second to proofread the sentence with your own name in it?  Please.

Defendant Obama -- or, as Berg calls him, "Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham [hereinafter "Obama"]," is running for president.  But he can't be president, according to Berg, who charges that Obama is not a "natural born citizen" because, "just to name one of the problems," he "lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen" and the family moved there.  Just to name two of the problems with that argument, (1) it concedes that Obama had U.S. citizenship to lose, and (2) it's wrong -- you don't lose citizenship just because your mom marries a non-citizen, even if you move.  I admit I haven't researched this yet, but Berg did not cite any support for it in his motion, although he did underline the argument and put it in bold.

For the most part, Berg just raises "questions" about Obama's birthplace (Berg claims it was Kenya) and resulting citizenship, and then charging that Obama "has refused to prove" he is qualified to run.  Actually, the complaint concedes that Obama has posted his birth certificate on his website, but, Berg says, "as posted all over the internet," that is a forgery.  And as we should all know by now, anything posted all over the internet must be true.

The complaint includes three counts: (1) violation of Article II, Section I of the Constitution; (2) "dual citizenship," and (3) fraud.  Berg concludes, "For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency."

What is especially amusing about all this is that, as Berg may or may not know, the other guy in the race has the same problem, if it is a problem.  John McCain was not born in the U.S. -- he was born in the Canal Zone.  There is no question that he is a U.S. citizen, since both his parents were.  But Article II doesn't say "citizen" -- it says "natural born Citizen."  And, it seems, nobody really knows for sure what that means.  Barry Goldwater had the same problem (he was born in Arizona, but before it was a state), as did Mitt Romney's dad, George, who was born in Mexico.  None of these people were disqualified from running, despite the legal uncertainty about the term.  George Romney's opponent apparently did insist on calling Romney "Jorge," but that's the worst that has happened so far.

Obama's "campaign scheme" can go forward, at least for now, because the motion was denied after a hearing on Friday.  Sadly, a transcript of that hearing does not yet seem to be available, but the pleadings (downloaded from the court via PACER) are posted below.

Link: iReport.com (Flash required)
Link: Complaint in Berg v. Obama (PDF)
Link: Motion for TRO in Berg v. Obama (PDF)
Link: Order Denying TRO in Berg v. Obama (PDF)

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on August 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0029 secs (from cache 10/31/26 03:15:06)