Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> AFL-CIO NOW BLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: AFL-CIO NOW BLOGPennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds PLAs
By admin
This is a cross-post from the Electrical Workers (IBEW.)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has affirmed a lower court?s ruling upholding project labor agreements (PLAs) on state-funded construction projects.
A group of nonunion contractors sued the state’s Department of General Services in an attempt to halt the renovation of the SCI Graterford prison using PLAs, arguing that the agreement discriminated against nonunion workers.
Judge Dan Pellegrini, speaking for the majority in the case of Hawbaker v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania last month, disagreed arguing that nonunion contractors have as much opportunity to bid on state projects as signatory contractors.
Project labor agreements are project-specific, pre-hire collective bargaining agreements that help contractors and managers provide cost-efficient, high-quality and on-time construction.
Open-shop contractors and anti-union political operatives have beefed up their legislative campaign against PLAs in the past couple of years, promoting local anti-PLA ballot initiatives and pushing newly elected Republican state officials to outlaw the use of the agreements on public projects?a move that many policy experts say will hurt workers, contractors and taxpayers.
Says Cornell University researcher Fred Kotler, in a 2009 study of PLAs:
Project labor agreements make sense for public works projects because they promote a planned approach to labor relations, allow contractors to more accurately predict labor costs and schedule production timetables, reduce the risks of shoddy work and costly disruptions and encourage greater efficiency and productivity.
The court also notes that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1993 that PLAs were legal under federal labor law.
Says IBEW President Edwin D. Hill:
PLAs have proven again and again to be efficient tools for state and local officials to get construction jobs done on time and on budget. It?s heartening to see the highest court in Pennsylvania debunk many of anti-PLA distortions promoted by groups like ABC.
Full post as published by AFL-CIO NOW BLOG on February 04, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Pennsylvania Employment Law
alleged violations of Pennsylvania labor laws including discrimination, harassment and overtime pay.
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
American Corrective Counseling Services to Pay $2.55 Million In Pennsylvania Class Action
Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

"Pa. Supreme Court upholds state prisons' ban on pornography"
"Ga. Supreme Court upholds ER statute"
"State Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban"
"State Supreme Court upholds LAX ban on Hare Krishna fundraising"
Mexican Supreme Court Upholds Legal Abortion in Mexico City








