Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> The Landlord Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: The Landlord Law BlogTenancy Deposit Protection Schemes - news and views
Excuse me, but doesn?t that also mean that 88% of landlords are losing their cases?
Meaning that under this scheme (primarily used by landlords rather than agents), more landlords are found wanting than tenants. Does that not perhaps also indicate that the TDPS was, perhaps, a good thing after all? (Contrary to the squawks of the landlords associations before the schemes were set up, including the NLA which now runs the My Deposits scheme).
Looking around at the schemes web-sites for more news, I see that the Dispute Services scheme web-site states that they are finding that only 2% of cases need adjudication, a lower than anticipated figure. As we do not know the percentage of My Deposits cases which go to arbitration, it is difficult to make much comment. However one could speculate that if there are more disputes in the My Deposits scheme (which is aimed at landlords) than in the Dispute Services scheme (which is aimed at agents), then that would indicate that agents tend on the whole to deal with deposits in a more responsible way than landlords. Needless to say, agents have been saying this for years.
There is also of course the shocking statistic put forward by the DPS of 62% of landlords not protecting the deposit at all (discussed in my post here).
Even though 88% (i.e. most of) of disputes with landlords are won by tenants, I suspect that it is still mostly only the good landlords who have protected their deposits, and that the worst landlords are still getting away with it.
Full post as published by The Landlord Law Blog on September 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Bank Transaction
City Bank president Mike Liner agrees to pay $25,000 fine for assisting in a cash deposit.
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.
Newspaper Employees
Chinese Daily News must pay $5.19 million class action settlement for failing to pay overtime.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.

Tenancy and occupation through employment
Harvey v Bamforth - request for further information
Post mortem revival of tenancy
FDIC Chairman Sheila C. Bair Reiterates Promise of Deposit Insurance
Dear Criminals: You earned your money this time







