Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogPROPOSED REVIEW DUTCH CARIBBEAN CROSS BORDER MERGER LEGISLATION
By Karel.Frielink
Proposed bill introduces outbound mergers
Earlier in 2010, a draft bill was proposed to amend the Corporate Code (Book 2 Civil Code) of Curacao, St. Maarten, Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba (which formerly constituted the Netherlands Antilles). Hopefully, the Bill comes into force in 2011.
The possibility already currently exists that in connection with a merger, a foreign legal entity as the disappearing legal entity merges with a comparable legal form of Book 2 BW on the condition that the law governing that foreign legal entity is not incompatible with the merger and the manner in which it is brought about (Article 2:323a BW; ?inbound?). It will now also become possible that a legal entity within the sense of Book 2 BW as the disappearing legal entity merges with an acquiring legal entity under foreign law (Article 2:323b of the proposed bill; ?outbound?). A condition in this case is also that the law governing that foreign legal entity is not incompatible with the merger and the manner in which it is brought about.
With regard to the acquiring (foreign) legal entity the rules applicable to such a merger of the foreign law applicable to that legal entity are taken into account as much as possible. Articles 2:310 up to and including 2:334 Civil Code are applicable but exclusively with regard to the disappearing legal entity. This means for instance that the objection provisions of Article 2:316 Civil Code are applicable.
The Dutch arrangement whereby a minority shareholder casting his vote against the merger can request the Court to award him compensation is not included in Book 2 Civil Code. For that matter it is imaginable that a shareholder who suffers a loss as a consequence of the merger, can under certain circumstances claim compensation for it. However, a claim in that sense must be judged under the ordinary rules of the law of property as they are coloured by the law on legal persons.
Karel Frielink
Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner
(17 November 2010)
.
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on November 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Merger Agreement Rejected
Finish Line and Genesco reach $175 million settlement in merger dispute.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
US Government
alleging land surveyors should not be allowed on private property to build a US Mexican border wall.
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Anthem Blue Cross
Settles with California
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services

Cross-border Merger, Vertical Structure, and Spatial Competition
Highmark Blue Shield and Independence Blue Cross Merger in the News
SEC Proposes Changes to Cross-Border Tender and Exchange Offer Rules
Inner Temple and Middle Temple merger








