Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogDUTCH SAME-SEX COUPLES HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS DUTCH CARIBBEAN OPPOSITE-MARRIED COUPLES
By Karel.Frielink
Spigthoff represented plaintiff
According to a recent court ruling in the Netherlands Antilles (Court of First Instance, 17 July 2008), a same-sex couple that was married in the Netherlands and subsequently moved to the Netherlands Antilles (Curacao), has the same rights under Netherlands Antilles law (or Aruba law as the case may be) as Netherlands Antilles opposite-married couples as far as health insurance is concerned. Dr. Douwe Boersema of Spigthoff Attorneys & Tax Advisers on Curacao represented the couple.
Same-sex couples have been able to marry in the Netherlands for the last seven years. However, Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles have not changed their legislation which still does not allow such marriages. Moreover, the government of the Netherlands Antilles refuses to treat same-sex couples who married in the Netherlands equally with opposite-married couples as does the government of Aruba.
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba ruled on 13 April 2007 that Aruba must recognize same-sex marriages registered in the Netherlands. Although same-sex marriages cannot be performed in Aruba or the Netherlands Antilles, both countries are forced to at least recognize same-sex marriages performed in the Netherlands. The rulings of the Supreme Court in The Hague and of the Court of First Instance on Curacao are based on the Kingdom Charter (?Statuut?): legal provisions in force in one part of the Kingdom have the same legal force in the other two parts of the Kingdom.
Generally speaking, in my opinion, and as a matter of principle, governments should not interfere with their citizens? private lives unless it is necessary to do so to protect their basic rights and freedom of choice. People should be as free as possible to make their own choices.
Karel Frielink
Attorney (lawyer) / Partner
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on August 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Stephen J. Hyland
alleging fraudulent operations in offering expertise in same gender couples' issues.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Windsor Healthcare Management
allegedly provided substandard care and neglected the rights of its senior residents.

Norway government proposes law extending rights of same-sex partners
Md. governor signs bills aiding unwed committed couples
WA State Domestic Partnership in Effect
Census reports more unmarried couples living together
California Supreme Court strikes down ban on same-sex marriage
French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage









