ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Susan Crawford Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Susan Crawford Blog

It costs more

By Susan Crawford

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Ann Arbor, Michigan, the “regional duopoloy” story of internet access seems to prevail.  It’s AT&T or Comcast.

I applied online for AT&T DSL, and for most of the process I was convinced that they were going to let me buy internet access *without* having an AT&T landline phone.  No go.  Little red type showed up on the screen [paraphrasing]:  Please tell us your existing AT&T number. You can’t get DSL alone.

I called Comcast, and the company’s representative said:

Internet access all by itself?  $57.95 per month.  But you can’t get our fastest download speed (6MB) without also buying some cable service.

So I ask the natural followup question:  How much would the really fast speed internet access cost with a basic cable package?

That’ll be $34.99/month for the first six months.

Although I guess it’s gratifying to have my basic thesis supported - that the cable companies are actually competing with the internet, and don’t want to have people hooked on internet access - this was irritating.

So I got a landline phone from AT&T (that I won’t use) plus their DSL service.

Meanwhile, this headline today, via Dewayne Hendricks and Dave Farber:

Telecoms Sue Over High-Speed Links

Telecommunications companies are suing cities around the nation to stop the construction of publicly owned fiber optic systems to bring high-speed Internet, telephone and cable television to communities far from metropolitan centers.

This line seemed particularly apt:

Many involved in the issue see a typical clash of viewpoints in the litigation embroiling Monticello, Minn., a town near Minneapolis, and TDS Telecom, a subsidiary of Bridgewater Telephone Co.

. . . A motion for dismal is scheduled to be argued on July 18. Bridgewater Telephone Co. v. Monticello, No. 86-CV-08-4555.

Dismal indeed.  Of course the existing incumbents don’t want to see government intervention in internet access services - even though government intervention and the creation of a whole host of policies and subsidies supporting broad internet access brought the internet into widespread use in this country.

Full post as published by Susan Crawford Blog on July 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 10/31/26 10:07:24)