Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatQuick question on "non-asserts"
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The IPKat has been asked a quick question: perhaps you have the answer. It sometimes happens, usually when an intellectual property dispute is settled by agreement, that the IP rights owner undertakes not to assert his right against the other party to the agreement. In theory the rights owner merely forbears to sue, but in practice it can be said to be a licence. Does any reader of this blog know of any reported cases -- in any jurisdiction -- which turned on whether the non-assert was characterised as a licence or not? If so, can he or she please email the IPKat here and tell him.Forbears here
Forebears here
Four bears here
Full post as published by IPKat on October 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Hayes Bicycle Group
Recalls Quick-Release Devices
Medtronic
Recalls Specific Lots of Paradigm Quick-Set Infusion Sets
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

First Topic: Broadest Reasonable Interpretation
Quick Q&A - What happens if I cant find the Will
When a party asserts the Fifth Amendment in a divorce proceeding
Quick Q&A - Can I change title to real estate without Florida probate








