Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Two-Seventy-One Patent BlogPwC Publishes 2010 Patent Litigation Study
By Peter Zura
? Despite a small uptick of granted patents in 2009, the number of filed patent actions dropped to 2,744, a decrease of over 6% from 2008. This broke a 3-year trend of growth in case filings, since the last drop in 2005. NPEs are involved in almost 20% of reported decisions
? Annual median damages continue to hold steady - between 1995 and 2009, median damages ranged between $2.4M to $10.5M. However, damage awards for NPEs averaged more than triple those for practicing entities since 2001 ($12.9M vs. $3.9M).
? NPEs continue to be vulnerable to summary judgment - overall, NPEs have a 31% success rate versus 40% for practicing entities. In instances when a final decision is made at summary judgment, NPEs are successful only 13% of the time (vs. 20% for practicing entities). However, both have about a 2/3 win rate at trial.
? NPEs have increased their success rate over the last 4 years. In 2005, NPEs suffered from a decade-low success rate of 23%. In 2009, the success rate jumped to 48%.
? Declaratory judgment actions increase win rates fort alleged infringers. However, the increased win rate is only significant when the patent holder is an NPE.
? Despite the large volume of patent cases, median time-to-trial holds steady: 69% of cases reached trial within 3 years from the filing date of the initial complaint.
The Fastest Jurisdictions (Median Time-To-Trial, In Years):
- ED Virginia -- 0.93
- WD Wisconsin -- 1.07
- MD Florida -- 1.71
- D. Delaware -- 1.89
- SD Texas -- 2.00
- ED Texas -- 2.04
- SD Florida -- 2.27
- CD California -- 2.28
- ND Texas -- 2.42
- D. Minnesota -- 2.45
- SD New York -- 2.50
- D New Jersey -- 2.71
- ND California -- 2.95
- ND Illinois -- 3.42
- D. Massachusetts -- 3.64
- ED Virginia
- D. Delaware
- ED Texas
- MD Florida
- CD California
- SD Texas
- WD Wisconsin
- ND California
- ND Texas
- ND Illinois
- D Minnesota (tie)
- D. New Jersey (tie)
- D Massachusetts
- SD New York
- SD Florida
- MD Florida -- 59.1% overall, 80% trial success rate
- ED Texas -- 55.3% overall, 66.7% trial success rate
- D. Delaware -- 47.3% overall, 64.5% trial success rate
- CD California -- 47% overall, 72.4% trial success rate
- ED Virginia - 45.9% overall, 70.6% trail success rate
- SD Florida -- 26.5% overall, 42.9% trial success rate
- D. New Jersey -- 32.2% overall, 57.9% trial success rate
- SD Texas -- 32.4% overall, 66.7% trial success rate
- WD Wisconsin -- 32.4% overall, 40% trial success rate
- ND California -- 33% overall, 71.1% trial success rate
Full post as published by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog on December 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Procrit
Associated with Death in Stroke Study

PricewaterhouseCoopers Patent Litigation Study
Study: Patent Litigation Protects Holders
Patent litigation by the numbers
Patent Law Bits and Bytes: Holiday Cheer








