Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Trade Secrets Vault
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: The Trade Secrets VaultObservations On Licensing: Does ?Design Around? Have a Place in Trade-Secret Licensing?
We all know that while patents and trade secrets may both potentially cover similar subject matters, the rights and obligations afforded by each are fundamentally different. From my experience, however, the differences between the two sets of rights are not always fully appreciated in practice. A particularly interesting example is the differing function of ?design around? in patents and trade secrets, respectively. Patent law and practice has carved out a central place for the ability of persons to design around existing patents, based on disclosure and publication of patented inventions. On the one hand, the publication of patents serves to prevent the duplication of inventions by setting a rough boundary within which competing inventions tread at their own legal peril. On the other hand, the publication of patents enables competitors to design around the protected invention, adding to the reservoir of disclosed inventions that will ultimately become part of the public domain. Ideally, therefore, the ability to design around contributes to both the quality and quantity of patents. Licensing may have a role in this process. A licensee might not only make direct use of the licensed patent, but might also take advantage of the knowledge and experience gained through the license to design around the patent. If this occurs, however, there is nothing in principle that prevents the licensee from seeking to design around the licensed patent, just as third parties may do so, assuming that in doing so the licensee is not in breach of some contractual or other obligation.
Full post as published by The Trade Secrets Vault on January 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Video Technology
RealNetworks to pay $533,500 settlement in licensing lawsuit.
Victoria's Secret
Bras may have caused Woman's Itching, Rash and Welts
$69M Settlement Approved in Volkswagen, Audi Design Defect Class Action
$69M Settlement Approved in Volkswagen, Audi Design Defect Class Action
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.

"Licensing a Work, and When Licensing Doesn't Work"
Are trade secrets nothing but baby patents
Jorda on: The Criticality of Trade Secrets in Technology Licensing and Tech Transfer
New Online Licensing Deals Signal Direction For Music Industry
Jorda on : What is and What is not a Trade Secret
The illusory world of trade secret protection








