ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> ISinIP

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: ISinIP

A Method as Novel as Making Silver Jewelry in Mexico.

By thomason

ADVERTISEMENTS

Patent cases often are easy to spot on PACER, especially from the docket of the N.D. Cal.  The typical format for the style of the case is E-something vs. I-something, or Patent Holding Portfolio LLC vs. Fortune 500 name.  Familiarity with those style conventions almost made me miss a recently-filed patent case styled, American Mexican Insurance Service, LLC v. International Insurance Group, Inc., 08CV840-EMC.  My current-Bilski interest in post-State Street “methods” patents did cause me to question whether Mexican Insurance might reflect recent criticism of PTO granting patents on known business methods.The Complaint is not available on PACER, but the USPTO website yielded a patent assigned to Int’l Insurance, USP 7,240,017 for “dispensing insurance through a computer network.”  A visit to the American Mexican Insurance website indicated that they arrange coverage for Americans on adventurous travels in Mexico.  That put the matter in the sightlines of the `017 patent, which claims a method to provide “coverage in a country other than the country in which the customer resides.”  Sounds like a match.My adversion to business methods patents revolves around breadth, both in the claim as a whole and in the words used in the claim.  Consider, for yourself, whether the claimed method sounds novel.  It recites the steps of receiving “policy information” from a “plurality of insurance companies” such as “rates,” then contracting with an insurance “agent to sell” a policy as described in the policy information, receiving “customer data,” obtaining rate “calculations,” providing the customer with the “rates,” receiving a “selection from the customer” of a policy and the customer’s “instruction to purchase” and “customer financial” information, and “facilitating” the purchase and distributing a binder of coverage - using a computer network.  If the “other country” term is taken out, would the other steps suggest a novel method of offering, pricing and binding insurance coverage?Even Mexican Adventure insurance is not as novel as it may sound, but apparently it ‘rang the bell’ with the USPTO examiner.

Full post as published by ISinIP on March 05, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0031 secs (from cache 10/31/26 10:41:13)