Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links'Hot News' Doctrine Could Stifle Online Commentary and Criticism
By rebecca
San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), and Public Citizen Monday urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to consider the critical First Amendment questions at issue in a case asserting "hot news misappropriation" -- a doctrine that a federal court used to put time limit restrictions on the reporting of facts.
The defendant in the case, TheFlyOnTheWall.com, had gathered stock recommendations from investment banking firms like Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Lehman Brothers and reported them on its website. The firms sued TheFlyOnTheWall.com, claiming that the information was "hot news" and the website was free-riding on the firms' work in creating the recommendations. A federal court agreed with the investment banks and ordered TheFlyOnTheWall.com to delay reporting of the information for two hours after the reports are released.
"Surprisingly, no court has carefully explored the tension between the so-called 'hot news misappropriation' doctrine and freedom of speech and freedom of the press," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry. "We're asking the appeals court to recognize the elephant in the room and analyze the 'hot news' doctrine in light of the strong First Amendment protections developed by the Supreme Court to encourage the expression of truthful statements on matters of public concern."
Applying heightened First Amendment scrutiny is especially important now, as the Internet is increasingly allowing Americans to publicly gather, share, and comment on the news of the day. Misuse of the "hot news" doctrine could stifle this extraordinary growth of free expression.
"It's not hard to see how new and vital forms of social media could get caught in a 'hot news' dragnet," said McSherry. "The court must ensure that this doctrine is not used to quash online commentary and information-sharing."
For the full amicus brief:
http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/barclays_v_fly/FlyBriefFinal.pdf
Contact:
Corynne McSherry
Senior Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
corynne@eff.org
Full post as published by Electronic Freedom Foundation - Deep Links on June 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.
Newspaper Employees
Chinese Daily News must pay $5.19 million class action settlement for failing to pay overtime.
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Online Medication Sites
Prescription Drugs Sold Without Prescriptions
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.

Vision Media TV Tries to Evade Section 230 Immunity to Squelch Criticism
Gay Discrimination Bill Will Stifle Free Speech, Advance Homosexual Agenda, Critics Say
Church tax exemptions: privilege or right
In commentary available online at FindLaw
Murdoch news wire pursues 'hot news' claim
Googles Thin-Skinned LawyersBits








