ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Threat Level

ACTA Backs Away From 3 Strikes

By David Kravets

ADVERTISEMENTS

A proposed global intellectual-property treaty no longer nudges the international community to develop “three strikes” protocols to suspend internet connections of customers caught downloading copyrighted works, according to a draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement released Tuesday.

The official draft of the proposed intellectual property accord was released after months of leaks and assertions by the Obama administration that it was a classified national security secret.

Still, critics of the proposal said Tuesday that a controversial theme in the draft (.pdf) remains: that the United States was “attempting to export a regulatory regime that favors big media companies at the expense of consumers and innovators,” according to Public Knowledge, a Washington, D.C., digital rights group.

The group and others were, in part, referring to the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Under the DMCA, internet service providers are responsible for the infringing material hosted on their networks if they fail to remove the content at the rights holder’s request.

That is a sea change to Canadian copyright statutes, for example. “That is inconsistent with Canadian law, which has no such requirement,” said Michael Geist, an ACTA expert at the University of Ottawa.

A biggest surprise in the official draft, which is being hammered out by the United States, Canada, the European Union, Japan and dozens of others, is the removal of a controversial U.S.-backed footnote that appeared in an unofficial, yet previously leaked version. The footnote provided for “the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscriptions and accounts on the service provider’s system or network of repeat infringers.”

Last month, the European Parliament voted not to approve ACTA if it contained these so-called “three strikes” or graduated response” termination requirements.

Those policies are the holy grail of internet-IP enforcement, staunchly backed by the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America.

Negotiating entities include Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland the United States and the European Union.

The ACTA negotiators concluded meetings last week in New Zealand and are expected to meet in Switzerland in June. The accord is expected to be completed by year’s end.

Congressional authorization is not required.

See Also:


Full post as published by Threat Level on April 21, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 22:10:32)