ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Food Safety News

SF Fast Food Toy Ban Too Hot for Pre-Election Vote

By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck

ADVERTISEMENTS
San Francisco's efforts to restrict the use of toys to promote fast food for children has been pushed back a couple of weeks.  Why? Depends upon whom you talk to.
The city's 11-member board of supervisors moved Tuesday to postpone a vote on the controversial measure until Nov. 2.   
There were concerns about the timeline for implementing the ordinance if it passed, said Lin-Shao Chin, legislative assistant to the ordinance's primary sponsor, Supervisor Eric Mar.
Chin said Mar's office has been in discussion with various groups, including the California Restaurant Association, McDonald's, and Yum! Brands, owner of KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut. 
Implementation is a concern for the restaurants, agreed Daniel Conway, spokesman for the California Restaurant Association, which strongly opposes the measure. 
Speaking from Sacramento, Conway said Mar had come to appreciate, through discussions between the two sides, that complying with such a requirement wasn't something the industry could do overnight.
But Tuesday's motion to continue the proposed ordinance was political, as well, Conway said.
Come Nov. 2, San Franciscans will not only be voting for a new governor come Nov. 2 but will also be choosing new supervisors.  The city's popular mayor, Gavin Newsom, will term out of office. 
Mar may be looking to postpone action on the ordinance until after two potentially negative votes and a promised veto by the mayor are no longer threats, said Conway. 
"I think [Mar] did some political calculating," Conway said, "and is waiting."
Santa Clara County, about 40 miles south of San Francisco, enacted a similar measure earlier this year.  Whereas Santa Clara's restrictions apply only to restaurants in unincorporated parts of the county, San Francisco's legislation would affect all restaurants serving the city of nearly 800,000 people.

Full post as published by Food Safety News on October 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/05/26 05:56:35)