Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Safety News
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Food Safety NewsLetter From The Editor: Recalls & Warnings
By Dan Flynn and Suzanna Schreck
We were wishing that was the practice at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last week. A company called Nurture Inc. had a packaging problem with some of its organic baby food.
Because we received an e-mail alert about FDA's warning about ten hours before we received one about Nurture's recall notice, we made the government's apparent faster action than the company the lead of our story on Friday.
This led to my spending a large percentage of my very limited email time on Friday with Trish Scorpio, who handles the Nurture Inc. account for Kohnstamm Communications in St. Paul, MN.
After a couple of email exchanges and my looking at everything again, I realized the only gap that existed was in my receipt of an email alert for the Nurture recall notice. The company, located next to the Manhattan Bridge in Brooklyn, issued the recall notice about six hours before FDA got the public warning out.
We ran a corrected story on Saturday. We are not in the future going to put our trust in those email alerts, at least as it concerns the time when something happens.
The reason we highlighted the time issue to begin with is that if FDA issues a public warning before there is a recall, it pretty much forces the company's hand. But that was not what was happening in this case.
In fact, to its credit, Nurture has also provided a detailed list on its Web site of the Whole Foods and Target Stores that received the baby food with the package problems. Hopefully the day is coming when making the retail list public will be standard practice in a recall, but it is not now and Nurture is providing some leadership on an important issue.
We can and do correct important factual errors, but we cannot make everybody happy.
Someone at the National Peanut Board wrote us to object that we'd led with peanut butter being one of several items recalled by Parker Farms. She wanted us to revise the headline and make it clear that most of the recalled stuff wasn't peanut butter.
Sorry, no. We've been to Blakely several times. We've talked to peanut farmers. We know the peanut industry cares about food safety.
And we also know consumers want to trust peanut butter again. So we know they do NOT want to see peanut butter on anymore recall lists. That's whom we are watching out for.
Until next time.
Full post as published by Food Safety News on January 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Whats a Home Loan Modification?
How to Qualify for a Home Loan Modification
Acetaminophen
FDA Wants New Safety Warnings
CellCept
Roche Issues Changes to Warnings and Adverse Events
Darvon
Other Propoxyphene-Containing Meds to Require Stronger Warnings
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Quesos Mi Pueblito Recalls Cheese Products Because of Possible Health Risk
Quesos Mi Pueblito Recalls Cheese Products due to Possible Listeria Contamination
Wisconsin Firm Recalls Frozen Pepperoni and Sausage Pizza Products Due
Kraft Recalls Frozen Pepperoni and Sausage Pizza Products

Letter to the Editor: Freedom for the Unborn, too
Counting Clinical Opportunities
Letter to the Editor -- New York Times
Dangerous Medical Device Recalls Medtronic and the FDA
Best Old Cigarette Ads and Zoo Warnings







