Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Supreme Dicta
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Supreme DictaWhat's worse than citing foreign law? Citing Shakespeare
ADVERTISEMENTS
The good folks over at Concurring Opinions have previewed a new article that will be soon be published in my favorite law journal, the Green Bag. Prof. Todd Henderson of the University of Chicago has investigated the extent to which works of literary fiction are cited in appellate court decisions. Here are some of his findings:- The most frequently cited authors are "George Orwell (61 citations); William Shakespeare (35); Franz Kafka (34); John Milton (20); Homer, Chaucer, and Oscar Wilde (14 each)."
- "In the Seventh Circuit, Judges Posner and Easterbrook combined for nearly all citations to fiction, and over 80 percent of all references to George Orwell."
- "[O]f the 110 Supreme Court justices who have served, only 21 have ever cited to the authors or works in this survey. The leading Supreme Court fiction citers are Justices Douglas, Stevens, Brennan, and Rehnquist, each of whom has cited to fiction around five times. These four justices account for almost 50 percent of all Supreme Court citations to fiction."
- "[J]ustices appointed by Democrats or with an otherwise liberal voting record made almost 80 percent of all literary citations."
- "In the Supreme Court, nearly three-quarters of literary citations are in dissenting or concurring opinions (63 percent in dissenting; 27 percent in majority; and 10 percent in concurring). In the circuit courts, by contrast, the reverse is largely true, with about 64 percent in majority opinions and 36 percent in dissenting and concurring opinions."
Once again, the Green Bag rocks!
Full post as published by Supreme Dicta on April 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Lawsuits and Settlements
Schwan's Frozen Chicken
Recalled for Foreign Materials
Signal International
allegedly lured foreign workers to US shipyards with false promises of permanent resident status.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Law in a Nutshell, Wikipedia-Style
Agents: Talent, literary, theatrical, booking, etc.
A Case for Citing to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
Less Citing of US Supreme Court by Non-US Courts
Writing Well: Happy Birthday, Bill.








