Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Utah District Court Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Utah District Court BlogAnother Redaction that Wasn't Effective
ADVERTISEMENTS
Douglas Mallan writes in the Connecticut Law Tribune about "A Major Redaction Gaffe" in a case involving General Electric. Again, embarassing information specifically intended NOT to be public is in the public's hands.An "Emergency Motion to Seal by Consent of Parties" filed May 22, 2008 in Schaefer v. General Electric Co (Case No. 3:07-cv-00858-PCD) stated:
The motion was granted May 23rd, and corrected PDFs were uploaded May 28th.
Full post as published by Utah District Court Blog on May 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Creating and Using Custom Redaction Patterns
"Clumsy Redaction Can Spell Negligence"
New transcript redaction procedures go into effect









