ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Bookmark Follow Me Email to a friend

Federal Judiciary

: Decision of the Day

Fourth Amendment Rights for a Storage Locker Squatter

By Robert Loblaw (index)

U.S. v. Murphy, 06-30582 (9th Cir., Feb. 20, 2008)

Does a meth manufacturer who is squatting in a storage facility have the same Fourth Amendment rights as a person who is living in a house? That?s the issue that faces a panel of the Ninth Circuit in this criminal decision. The most interesting question for this appeal is whether the person renting the storage unit could validly consent to a search of the quarters occupied by the defendant, who had refused to allow the police to search. The issue is complicated by the fact that the renter knew that the defendant was living there but had recently tried to kick him out, obviously without success.

The Ninth concludes that search was unlawful under Georgia v. Randolph, in which the Supreme Court held that a wife?s consent to allow police officers to search the house did not trump her husband?s refusal. This is a fascinating decision, and I?d be surprised if Judge Reinhardt?s opinion survives scrutiny.

Full post as published by Decision of the Day on February 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Related Law Questions
Lawsuits and Settlements


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











Click here
0.2569 secs