Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeFalse marking case ordered transferred
By Michael C. Smith
Promote Innovation v. Schering, 2:10cv248 (2/14/11)
Judge: T. John Ward
Holding: Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTED
Well, this makes ten rulings, with nine cases transferred and one denied. Plaintiff is located in Houston, and defendant is in New Jersey. The Court's analysis disclosed "almost zero" facts alleging connecting the case to the Eastern District of Texas, and "nearly all facts relevant to the venue transfer analysis" showing a closer connection with New Jersey. I could go through the anslysis, but after Judge Ward's opinion in Texas Data v. Target, there's really no need to.
The only significant new fact was this - Plaintiff noted that the defendant did not file this motion until after the 11/23/10 status conferences (at which as I have mentioned two motions to transfer were orally granted, resulting in a mad scramble to file motions in the cases where they had not previously been filed) and argued that this delay warranted denying the motion. The Court disagreed, and noted, citing the againg rock star of the venue caselaw's - its equivalent of AC/DC (or Spinal Tap, depending on your perspective) - Mohamed v. Mazda, 90 F. Supp. 757, 760 (E.D. Tex. 2000) for the proposition that a venue motion can be made at any time. The Court also noted that the plaintiff asked for an extension to respond to the motion, which didn't help out the "delay" argument, apparently.
In the end, the Court found that three factors weighed in favor of transfer, and only one - the relative difference in time to trial - weighed against it, noted recent Federal Circuit caselaw holding that in this situation, transfer is indicated, and concluded that the proposed transferee forum was "clearly more convenient."
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on February 19, 2011 (boomark / email).
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
Employee Theft
Mother and daughter ordered to pay $1 million settlement for writing false paychecks.
Sperm Donor
Ordered to Pay Child Support
Hope Food Supply
ordered to shut down by FDA and recall seafood products
Tuberculosis Testing:
False Positives
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.

Judge Sue L. Robinson: Motion to Transfer False Marking Case GRANTED
Patently-O Patent L.J.: Overlapping Plaintiffs in False Marking Litigation
False Marking False Marking False Marking False Marking all at up to $500 per offense
False Marking: Calculating Damages Part I
Patent False Marking: Not Dead Yet







