Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: SCOTUSBLOGArgument Preview: Irizarry v. United States
By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group
ADVERTISEMENTS
Stanford student Erica Ross wrote the following preview of the second case to be argued on Tuesday, Irizarry v. US. Read her entire entry here, on SCOTUSwiki.
In Irizarry v. United States, No. 06-7517, the Court will consider whether a district court must provide the parties with notice that it is contemplating a departure from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range on a ground not identified for departure in the presentence report or in a party?s prehearing submission. Petitioner Richard read more
Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on April 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Another notable notice opinion before Irizarry
Will Irizarry finally explain the true nature of the post-Booker world
Irizarry is interesting, but is it important or just iterant








