Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyWill Irizarry finally explain the true nature of the post-Booker world?
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
I have mentioned before that I think the sleeper SCOTUS sentencing case this term in Irizarry, which technically addresses a seemingly little issue concerning notice for imposing sentences outside the guidelines. However, as revealed in the amicus brief supporting the Eleventh Circuit's ruling below (to which I contributed), the case presents an opportunity for the Justices to address more broadly the nature and status of departures and variances in the post-Booker world. This amicus brief can be downloaded below, and here is the start of the summary of argument which highlights the deep conceptual issues that the Justices might have to address in Irizarry:Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 does not require a district court to provide notice prior to imposing a sentence outside the range recommended by the advisory Guidelines based on the factors set forth in 18 U...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on March 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Washington Post WPO Securities Fraud
Washington Post WPO
True Value
Recalls Wheelbarrows
Male Enhancement Products
Recalled Nationwide by Nature & Health
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Washington Post 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Argument Preview: Irizarry v. United States
Peter Goldberger on Booker/Fanfan
Irizarry: 32(h) does not require notice of contemplated variance
Briefs filed Today by Respondents Booker, Fanfan and their Amici
Links to H.R. 1528 (the Booker-Fix) Materials







