ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Basis for decision in Dan Rather's suit that documents were not privileged?

ADVERTISEMENTS

The NYT story is here.  After Dan Rather reported on George W. Bush's military service, and the report was shown to be based on forged documents, CBS convened an investigatory panel which in turn hired a law firm -- K&L Gates.  Apparently the communications between the panel and K&L Gates were held not to be privileged and will be produced to Rather. Does anyone know the basis for the decision?  These sorts of investigations, with law firms doing much of the investigating, have been an explosive growth area since at least the Enron implosion, and the legal issues surrounding privilege are important to follow. 

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on July 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 11/04/26 14:55:08)