ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Estate Planning

: Toronto Estate Law Blog

Waiving the deposit requirement under the Estate Administration Tax Act, 1998

By Hull & Hull LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS

Section 3 of the Estate Administration Tax Act, 1998, requires an applicant for a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee to make a deposit in an amount equal to the tax that will become payable under the Act.  There is an exemption in subsection 4(2) of the Act, which grants a judge discretion to allow the "estate certificate" (as defined by the Act) where the judge is satisfied:

(a) that the estate certificate is urgently required;

(b) that financial hardship would result from not issuing the estate certificate before the deposit is made; and

(c) that sufficient security for the payment of the tax under this Act has been furnished to the court.

This provision was considered in Re Ethier Estate (2000), 35 E.T.R. (2d) 219.  The applicant's request for a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee With a Will based on only partial payment of the appropriate deposit was refused.  First, the applicant did not supply any evidence to show what efforts were made to obtain the needed funds.  Subsection 4(2) "offers last-resort relief to an applicant", who must establish why he is unable to advance the entire deposit to the estate, which may include taking out a loan.  But mere convenience for the applicant is not a relevant consideration. 

Second, "urgent" means "pressing or requiring prompt action".  This element must be established on the evidence, and any delay in bringing the motion must be explained in the application material.  In Re Ethier Estate, the applicant failed to explain a 4 month delay.

Third, "financial hardship" is not merely financial loss or privation, it involves severe financial loss or privation.  This must be established on the evidence. 

Re Ethier Estate describes a high bar for an exemption from the deposit requirement, or even a partial exemption. 

Enjoy the weekend,

Chris Graham

 

   

Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on November 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0023 secs (from cache 11/04/26 23:22:08)