ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Election-Campaign Law

: Election Updates

Why the ?Christmas Day Intelligence Failure? might be of interest to election scholars and administrators

By Michael Alvarez

ADVERTISEMENTS

My colleague Jeff Jonas has written an important essay on the “Christmas Day Intelligence Failure”, the first of at least two parts: “The Christmas Day Intelligence Failure ? Part I: Enterprise Amnesia vs. Enterprise Intelligence”. It’s an interesting essay, and well worth a read.

As readers of this blog likely know, there is similar interest in the elections community in data matching, in particular as regards state voter registration databases. Thad and I wrote a number of years ago about the potential value for election administration of data exchange standards (“The Next Big Election Challenge: Developing Electronic Data Transaction Standards for Election Administration?). More recently, I was part of a team (including Jonas) that produced a paper on an intrastate voter registration data matching project, in collaboration with election officials from Oregon and Washington: “Interstate Voter Registration Database Matching: The Oregon-Washington 2008 Pilot Project.” Also, Jonas and I were part of the National Academy of Sciences committee that examined state voter registration databases in detail, including a lot of study of interoperability and intrastate matching.

In his Part 1 essay on the “Christmas Day Intelligence Failure” Jeff talks about “enterprise intelligence”, and he describes how an intelligent system would have identified the suspect:

What would analysts and policy makers expect from an “intelligent” system? Abdulmutallab applies for a multi-entry visa. The terrorist database (TIDE) is checked and found to contain no such record. The State Department issues a visa. Later, a TIDE record for Abdulmutallab is added to TIDE. The split-second this record is added to TIDE, the State Department is notified the visa may need reconsidered. (Was there enough evidence for revocation?) I believe when the dust settles and the forensics analysis is completed, whether it is open source or other intelligence collection, it will be clear Abdulmutallab would not have made it onto that plane, so long as this additional fodder was made discoverable.

While I think there is still a lot that we need to learn about the databases the intelligence community uses, and in particular what sorts of matching algorithms they employ, the important lesson for election administrators and scholars at this moment in time is that as we begin to design systems for database matching using state voter registration data, we ought to make sure that they are being designed to have the very intelligent properties that Jeff discusses in his essay.

Full post as published by Election Updates on January 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0028 secs (from cache 11/02/26 21:18:07)